HR8365
Referred to committee
Monitor Accountability Act
- Federal
- House
- Introduced Apr 20, 2026
- Session 119
Bill Text
Version EHThis Act may be cited as the Monitor Accountability Act.
Not later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following:
Such person—
may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Judicial Conference of the United States may establish; and
shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.
Such person may not be—
appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time;
appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or
reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order.
A monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor.
Prior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon.
In the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing.
The court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance.
On the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending.
On an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include—
information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and
whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate.
The court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1).
In the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years—
a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and
the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section.
It is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorships should be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.
Not later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following:
Such person—
may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Judicial Conference of the United States may establish; and
shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.
Such person may not be—
appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time;
appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or
reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order.
A monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor.
Prior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon.
In the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing.
The court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance.
On the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending.
On an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include—
information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and
whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate.
The court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1).
In the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years—
a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and
the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section.
It is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorships should be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.
Legislative Timeline
22 actions-
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
-
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486)
-
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365.
-
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
-
Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486)
-
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509)
-
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
-
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
-
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11.
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.