HB 2062
Law effective July 1, 2025
Providing for child support orders for unborn children from the date of conception, including the direct medical and pregnancy-related expenses of the mother as a factor in child support orders and providing for an income tax exemption for unborn and stillborn children, requiring courts to consider the value of retirement accounts in certain circumstances, authorizing payment from certain retirement accounts to pay child support arrearages and eliminating the exemption of pension and retirement moneys from claims to fulfill child support obligations.
- Kansas
- House / Assembly
- Introduced Jan 22, 2025
- Session 2025-2026
Official Bill Page
Loading official bill page…
This state’s bills aren’t available here
Kansas’s legislature doesn’t allow its bill pages to be shown on other sites. You can read the full bill on the official page.
View on official siteLegislative Timeline
36 actions-
Law effective July 1, 2025
-
Reengrossed on Thursday, March 27, 2025
-
Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 31, 2025
-
Vetoed by Governor; Returned to House on Wednesday, April 9, 2025
-
Motion to override veto prevailed; Yea 87, Nay 38
-
Motion to override veto prevailed; Yea 31, Nay 9
-
Conference Committee Report was adopted; Yea 87, Nay 38
-
Conference Committee Report agree to disagree adopted; Rep. Susan Humphries, Rep. Laura Williams and Rep. Dan Osman appointed as second conferees
-
Conference committee report now available
-
Conference Committee Report was adopted; Yea 31, Nay 9
-
Conference committee report now available
-
Conference Committee Report agree to disagree adopted; Sen. Kellie Warren, Sen. Kenny Titus and Sen. Ethan Corson appointed as second conferees
-
Nonconcurred with amendments; Conference Committee requested; appointed Rep. Susan Humphries, Rep. Laura Williams and Rep. Dan Osman
-
Motion to accede adopted; Sen. Kellie Warren, Sen. Kenny Titus and Sen. Ethan Corson appointed as conferees
-
Final Action - Passed as amended; Yea 30, Nay 9, Absent 1
-
Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Sen. Cindy Holscher
-
Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Sen. Cindy Holscher was rejected
-
Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Sen. Patrick Schmidt
-
Sen. Virgil Peck raised a question of germaneness. The amendment was ruled germane.
-
Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Sen. Patrick Schmidt was adopted
-
Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Sen. David Haley
-
Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Sen. David Haley was rejected
-
Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
-
Committee Report recommending bill be passed by Senate Committee on Judiciary
-
Referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
-
Final Action - Passed as amended; Yea 85, Nay 34, Absent 6
-
Received and Introduced
-
Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Rep. Dan Osman
-
Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Rep. Dan Osman was rejected
-
Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Rep. Bob Lewis
-
Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Rep. Bob Lewis was adopted
-
Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
-
Engrossed on Tuesday, February 18, 2025
-
Committee Report recommending bill be passed by House Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced
-
Referred to House Committee on Judiciary